New paper in Biogeosciences!
21 May 2026
How reliable are predictions when the world doesn’t look like the training data?
21 May 2026
How reliable are predictions when the world doesn’t look like the training data?
To build resilience against climate change, we need a better understanding of our ecosystems. Remote sensing, in combination with deep learning, can tell us a lot about plant traits that are essential for environmental applications. Hyperspectral satellite missions collect data on biophysical, biochemical, and structural variations within plant canopies, while deep learning models help predict plant traits based on these remote sensing data.
But here’s the problem: when deep learning models are applied to data that differ from the training material (out-of-domain: OOD), for example from different regions, biomes, or sensors, the predictions become less accurate. It is therefore important to effectively quantify the uncertainty of the predicted values.
Because current methods for measuring uncertainty are often overly optimistic, Cherif et al. propose a distance-based uncertainty estimation method (Dis_UN) in their latest article published in Biogeosciences. The method, supported amongst others by multi-year data collected at LMU Munich in Tobias Hank’s research group, quantifies uncertainty by measuring how (dis)similar the training data and the new data are, based on quantile regressions that capture worst-case scenarios (i.e. the highest possible error).
Key results
Assessing uncertainties is an important step when applying models beyond their training domain. Only then can we make reliable and robust statements about our ecosystems that can support resilience-building in a warming climate.